Research - Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research ( 2024) Volume 13, Issue 8
Correlation between Perioperative Serum Albumin Levels and Complications in Usage of Drugs and Alcohol on Major Abdominal Surgery
Mirton1*, M. Iqbal Rival1, Erkadius2 and Hesty Rhauda Ashan32Department of Public Health, Andalas University, Indonesia
3Department of Clinical Pathology, Bengkulu University, Indonesia
Mirton, Department of Surgery, Andalas University, Indonesia, Email: aji989957@gmail.com
Received: 31-Jul-2024, Manuscript No. JDAR-24-147311; Editor assigned: 02-Aug-2024, Pre QC No. JDAR-24-147311 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Aug-2024, QC No. JDAR-24-147311; Revised: 21-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. JDAR-24-147311 (R); Published: 28-Aug-2024, DOI: 10.4303/JDAR/236402
Abstract
Background and purpose: Surgical trauma often leads to capillary leaks and inflammatory responses, which in turn cause a decrease in albumin levels. Hypoalbuminemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery can prolong treatment, increase the risk of complications, and elevate mortality rates. This study aims to explore the correlation between perioperative serum albumin levels and the occurrence of complications in major abdominal surgeries, particularly in the context of drug and alcohol usage.
Methods: This study is a prospective analytic research conducted with a cohort design at the Surgery Division of Dr. M Djamil Padang. The sample included 36 patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery who met the inclusion criteria. Perioperative albumin levels were measured, and the data were analyzed using the chi-square method, with a significance threshold set at P ≤ 0.05.
Results: A significant correlation was found between postoperative albumin levels, postoperative albumin depletion, and the incidence of major postoperative complications in abdominal surgery.
Conclusion: Perioperative serum albumin levels can serve as an independent indicator of successful outcomes in major abdominal surgeries, especially in patients with a history of drug and alcohol usage.
Keywords
Serum albumin; Major abdominal surgery; Outcome
Introduction
Albumin is the largest and most important plasma protein in the human body. The decrease in albumin plasma concentration and its connection to surgical trauma has been recognized since 1985 by Fleck et al. (1985) who highlighted that surgical trauma leads to capillary leakage and inflammatory responses, resulting in reduced albumin levels. Surgery, particularly invasive procedures, damages body tissues and triggers both anabolic and catabolic metabolic phases postoperatively. Patients undergoing surgery, especially those with a history of drug and alcohol usage, are at heightened risk of malnutrition due to preoperative fasting, surgical stress, and increased metabolic demands [1,2].
The role of albumin in the circulating blood of critically ill patients differs significantly from its function in healthy individuals. In critical patients, low serum albumin levels are linked to poor outcomes. However, the use of exogenous albumin to correct albumin levels has not been shown to improve patient outcomes [2,3].
Protein-energy malnutrition is prevalent among surgical patients, with incidence rates ranging from 10%-50%. Assessing the nutritional status of these patients is crucial, as malnutrition is a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Albumin serves as a valuable marker in determining the prognosis of a disease. In hospitalized patients, hypoalbuminemia is associated with longer hospital stays, higher complication rates, and increased mortality. A meta-analysis revealed that for every 1.0 g/dL decrease in serum albumin, mortality increased by 137%, and morbidity by 89%. Another study found that a serum albumin concentration of less than 3.4 g/dL was linked to a 30-day mortality rate of 24.6%, which rose to 62% when serum albumin was below 2.0 g/dL [1-6].
The classification of major surgery depends on procedurerelated factors such as the surgical approach, duration, blood loss, and patient-related factors like nutritional status, underlying conditions, and comorbidities. Reliable and straightforward parameters are essential for assessing and identifying patients with risk factors during perioperative care, particularly those with a history of drug and alcohol use [5-7].
Postoperative complications are a significant concern following major abdominal surgery. These complications can range from local to systemic and may impair the function of various organ systems. Assessing the severity of surgical trauma is crucial for managing and addressing these complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification system, developed in 2004, is widely used to assess the severity of postoperative complications. This system is applicable across different centers due to its generalizability and ease of use [3,4].
Methods
This study was a prospective analytical study with a cohort study design. This study was conducted in the surgical department of Dr M DJAMIL Hospital Padang West Sumatra. The population is all patients in the hospital who will undergo elective major abdominal surgery. The inclusion criteria for this study were elective major digestive surgery, age >18 years, surgery with a laparotomy approach. Patients who refused to be included in the study, patients who died intraoperatively or died before 24 hours postoperatively, patients with comorbid factors (DM, endocrine disorders, pulmonary function disorders, history of MCI, cardiomyopathy, stroke), preoperative patients with symptoms of SIRS or sepsis, preoperative patients with unstable haemodynamics, surgery with an endo-laparoscopic approach were included in the exclusion criteria. Blood samples to assess serum albumin concentration were taken 24 hours before surgery and one day after surgery. Patients will be followed from the first postoperative day until discharge or death and assessed for postoperative outcomes categorised according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
The collected data will be processed, analysed and presented using 2 × 2 tabulation with the chi-square method and calculation with the diagnostic test formula with confidence limit of p<0.05 to compare preoperative, postoperative serum albumin levels and albumin depletion with postoperative outcomes based on the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Results
In a prospective analytical study with a cohort study design of 36 research subjects who underwent major abdominal surgery at Dr M. Djamil Padang Hospital from April 2017 to June 2017, the following results were obtained. The characteristics of the research subjects can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1: Characteristics subject study
Characteristics | f | % | Information |
---|---|---|---|
Age | - | - | Mean: 48.75 |
Operating hours | - | - | Mean: 190.41 |
Length of treatment | |||
<7 days | 12 | 33.30 | Mean: 7.60 |
>7 days | 24 | 66.70 | |
Type sex | |||
Woman | 19 | 52.80 | -
|
Man | 17 | 47.20 | |
Pre-op Albumin | Mean: 3.275 | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 17 | 47.20 | Max: 4.7 |
Normal albumin | 19 | 52.80 | Min: 2.5 |
Post-op Albumin | Mean: 2.53 | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 29 | 80.60 | Max: 3.8 |
Normal albumin | 7 | 19.40 | Min: 1.1 |
Albumin Depletion | Mean: 0.742 | ||
High (>1 mg/dl) | 10 | 27.80 | Max: 1.7 |
Low (<1 mg/dl) | 26 | 72.20 | Min: 0.2 |
Classification clavien-dindo | |||
No there is complications | 8 | 22.20 | -
|
Minor (grade 1-2) | 16 | 44.40 | |
Major (grade 3-4) | 8 | 22.20 | |
Mortality (grade 5) | 4 | 11.10 | |
Albumin group category | |||
A (Normal-D>1) | 1 | 2.80 | -
|
B (Normal-D<1) | 6 | 16.70 | |
C (Normo–hypo-D>1) | 6 | 16.70 | |
D (Normo–hypo-D<1) | 6 | 16.70 | |
E (hypo–hypo-D>1) | 3 | 8.30 | |
F (hypo–hypo-D<1) | 14 | 38.90 | |
Case | |||
Colorectal | 27 | 75.00 | -
|
Hepatobiliary | 4 | 11.10 | |
Upper GI tract | 2 | 5.60 | |
Other | 3 | 8.30 |
Tables 2 and 3 illustrate the results of the chi-square statistical test with the final Yates correction values of 2.376 and 0.683 (p>0.05) respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no association between age and gender with the incidence of complications in major abdominal surgery.
Table 2: Relationships age with success major abdominal surgery
Age (years) | Classification Clavier–dindo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minor complications | Major complications | chi-square Yates correction | |||
f | % | f | % | ||
20-50 | 16 | 80 | 4 | 20 | 2.376 |
50 | 8 | 50 | 8 | 50 | p>0.05 |
Table 3: Relationships type sex with success major abdominal surgery
Type sex | Classification Clavier–dindo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minor complications | Major complications | chi-square Yates correction | |||
f | % | f | % | ||
Man | 11 | 57.90 | 8 | 42.10 | 0.683
|
Woman | 13 | 76.50 | 4 | 23.50 | p>0.05 |
The relationship between pre-operative albumin levels and the success of major abdominal surgery can be seen in Table 4 below. The table illustrates the results of the chi-square statistical test with the final result of the p value=0.892 (p>0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no relationship between pre-operative albumin levels and the incidence of complications in major abdominal surgery.
Table 4: Relationships pre-operative albumin levels with success major abdominal surgery
Preoperative albumin | Classification Clavier–dindo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minor complications | Major complications | chi-square p-value | |||
f | % | f | % | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 10 | 58.80 | 7 | 41.10 | 0.892 |
Normal albumin | 14 | 73.70 | 5 | 26.30 | p>0.05 |
The relationship between post-operative albumin levels and the success of major abdominal surgery can be seen in Table 5 below. The table illustrates the results of the Fisher Exact statistical test with the final result of the fisher p value=0.041 (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a relationship between postoperative albumin levels and the incidence of complications in major abdominal surgery.
Table 5: Relationships postoperative albumin levels with success major abdominal surgery
Preoperative albumin | Classification Clavier-dindo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minor complications | Major complications | chi-square p-value | |||
f | % | f | % | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 17 | 58.60 | 12 | 41.40 | 0.041 |
Normal albumin | 7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | p<0.05 |
The association of albumin depletion with complications of major abdominal surgery can be seen in Table 6. The table illustrates the results of the chi-square statistical test with the final result of the Yates correction value=6.284 (p<0.05). Therefore, it can be concluded that there is an association between albumin depletion and the incidence of complications after major abdominal surgery.
Table 6: Relationships depletion with complications
Albumin depletion | Classification Clavier–dindo | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minor complications | Major complications | chi-square Yates correction | |||
f | % | f | % | ||
Depletion >1 | 3 | 30.00 | 7 | 70.00 | 6.824 |
Depletion <1 | 21 | 80.70 | 5 | 19.20 | p<0.05 |
Table 7 illustrates the results of the characteristics of serum albumin levels in the study subjects with complications that occur based on grading in the Clavien-Dindo classification. From this table the highest incidence of mortality occurred in group E.
Table 7: Perioperative characteristics of albumin with success major abdominal surgery
Category | Classification Clavier–dindo | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No there are complications | Minor complications | Major complications | Mortality | |||||
f | % | f | % | f | % | f | % | |
A | 1 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
B | 3 | 50.00 | 3 | 50.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
C | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 33.30 | 4 | 66.70 | 0 | 0.00 |
D | 1 | 16.70 | 4 | 66.70 | 1 | 16.70 | 0 | 0.00 |
E | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 33.30 | 2 | 66.70 |
F | 3 | 21.40 | 7 | 50.00 | 2 | 14.30 | 2 | 14.30 |
The relationship between pre-op albumin levels and length of treatment can be seen in Table 8 Initially, the normality test was carried out and the data was found to be normally distributed. Then proceed with the independent sample t-test to see the relationship between preoperative, postoperative, and albumin depletion levels with the length of stay in the hospital. From the results of statistical tests, it was found that there was no relationship between preoperative, postoperative, and albumin depletion levels on length of stay with a value of t=0.414, p=0.681 (p>0.05), a value of t=0.064, p=0.950 (p>0.05), a value of t=0.200, p=0.843 (p>0.05) respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no relationship between preoperative, postoperative, and albumin depletion levels with the length of treatment.
Table 8: Relationships level albumin with length of treatment
Level albumin pre-op | Length of treatment | chi-square p-value
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average | n | SD | t value | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 7,688 | 13.00 | 3.005 | 0.414 | 0.681 |
Normal albumin | 7,316 | 12.00 | 2.311 | -
|
p>0.05 |
Level albumin post op | Length of treatment | chi-square p-value
|
|||
Average | n | SD | t value | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 7,500 | 28 | 2,887 | 0.064 | 0.95 |
Normal albumin | 7,429 | 7 | 1.134 | -
|
p>0.05 |
Level Depletion albumin | Length of treatment | chi-square p-value
|
|||
Average | n | SD | t value | ||
Depletion<1 | 7,538 | 26 | 2.420 | 0.200 | 0.843 |
Depletion>1 | 7.333 | 8 | 3.279 | -
|
p>0.05 |
Discussion
Major abdominal surgery is closely related to adverse outcomes. This study aims to evaluate serum albumin levels as a marker of surgical trauma which is then used as a reference whether serum albumin levels can be used as a predictor of surgical success. Malnutrition is a problem that is often found in patients who will undergo major abdominal surgery, in accordance with the characteristics of the subjects of this study, where it was found that as many as 47.20% of the study subjects had serum albumin levels below 3.2 gr/dl. Albumin itself can be used as a parameter that describes the nutritional status of the patient. From this study, it can be seen the relationship between preoperative albumin levels and the incidence of postoperative complications with a p value=0.892, which statistically shows that preoperative serum albumin levels do not greatly affect the incidence of complications after major abdominal surgery, where the incidence of complications occurs almost equally in both the hypoalbumin and normo albumin groups [8-10].
This is in accordance with the results of previous research by Tadanobu Shimura et al. (2016) which states that preoperative albumin levels are not associated with the incidence of leakage in patients with colorectal anastomosis (p=0.474). However, in this study there was a mortality rate (Clavien-Dindo grade V classification) of 11.10% where the mortality rate only occurred in the preoperative hypoalbumin group while in the preoperative normoalbumin group there was no mortality rate. However, in the study of Tadanobu Shimura et al. (2016) the lowest cutt off albumin value in the study subjects was 3.2 gr/dl (median, 4.1 g/dL; range, 3.2 g/dl-4.6 g/dl) which means that none of the study subjects were in the hypoalbumin group [11-14].
The postoperative albumin value shows a decrease in the postoperative serum albumin level of the major abdomen. In accordance with the results of previous research by Smeets et al. (1994) who conducted postoperative hypoalbumin analysis explained that 70% of the decrease in serum albumin was due to increased vascular permeability which caused redistribution of albumin, 6% was due to decreased albumin synthesis function as a result of inflammatory mediators, 18% due to blood loss, and haemodilution of serum albumin due to fluid administration. Fleck et al. (1985) have also explained that TER (Transcapillary Escape Rate) increases 100% after major surgery and can increase up to 300% in patients with sepsis shock. Albumin sequestration into the third cavity is the main cause of acute albumin loss after surgery. In this study, 80.60% of the study subjects were in the hypoalbumin group and 19.40% in the normoalbumin group [15-20]. Statistically using the chisquare method there is a relationship between postoperative serum albumin levels and the occurrence of complications after major abdominal surgery with a p value=0.041. In this study, post-operative hypoalbuminemia has a higher risk of complications than the group with normal serum albumin levels. Another study by Ryan et al found a decrease in albumin on the first day after esophagotomy surgery below 2.0 gr/dl, which increases the risk of morbidity, prolongation of ICU care and high rates of reoperation. In another study by Tadanobu Shimura et al. (2016) stated that hypoalbuminemia on the first day postoperatively was associated with anastomosis leakage in colorectal patients where in the group with anastomosis leakage had serum albumin values with a median of 2.8 gr/dl and a range of 2.5 gr/dl-3.2 gr/dl, this value was lower than in the group without anastomosis leakage with a median of 3.2 with a range of 2.0 gr/dl-4.1 gr/dl (p=0.0001) [21-23].
Conclusion
Decreased postoperative serum albumin levels can be used as an indicator of the severity of surgical trauma and can be used as a predictor for the occurrence of complications after major abdominal surgery.
Conflicting Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this report.
Acknowledgement
None.
References
- H.P. Leite, M. Fisberg, W.B. de Carvalho, A.C. de Camargo Carvalho, Serum albumin and clinical outcome in pediatric cardiac surgery, Nutrition, 21(2005):553-558.
- D.R. Benjamin, Laboratory tests and nutritional assessment: Protein-energy status, Pediatr Clin North Am, 36(1989):139-161.
- J.E. Rhoades, C.E. Alexander, Nutritional problems of surgical patients, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 63(1955):268-275.
- K.B. Harvey, L.L. Moldawer, B.R. Bistrian, G.L. Blackburn, Biological measures for the formulation of a hospital prognostic index, Am J Clin Nutr, 34(1981):2013-2022.
- F.C.R. Herrmann, C. Safran, S.E. Levkoff, K.L. Minaker, Serum albumin level on admission as a predictor of death, length of stay and readmission, Arch Intern Med, 150(1992):125-130.
- A.M. Ryan, A. Hearty, R.S. Prichard, A. Cunningham, S.P. Rowley, et al. Association of hypoalbuminemia on the first postoperative day and complications following esophagectomy, Gastrointest Surg, 11(2007):1355-1360.
- J.I. Lee, M. Kwon, J.L. Roh, J.W. Choi, S.H. Choi, et al. Postoperative hypoalbuminemia as a risk factor for surgical site infection after oral cancer surgery, Oral Dis, 21(2015):178-184.
- C. Muller, A. Stift, S. Argeny, M. Bergmann, M. Gnant, et al. Delta albumin is a better prognostic marker for complications following laparoscopic intestinal resection for Crohn's disease than albumin alone-a retrospective cohort study, Plos One, 13(2018).
- Y. Fujiwara, H. Shiba, Y. Shirai, R. Iwase, K. Haruki, et al. Perioperative serum albumin correlates with postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy, Anticancer Res, 35(2015):499-503.
- O.M. Nielsen, Sequential changes in circulating total protein and albumin masses after abdominal vascular surgery, Ann Surg, 202(1985):231-234.
- J. Gibbs, W. Cull, W. Henderson, J. Daley, K. Hur, et al. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: Results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study, Arch Surg, 134(1999):36-42.
- B.M. Henry, S. Borasino, L. Ortmann, M. Figueroa, A.K.M.F. Rahman, et al. Perioperative serum albumin and its influence on clinical outcomes in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: A multi-centre retrospective study, Cardiol Young, 29(2019):761-767.
- P.A. Clavien, J. Barkun, M.L. de Oliveira, The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience, Ann Surg, 250(2009):187-196.
- M. HÃÃÂ??¼bner, S. Mantziari, N. Demartines, F. Pralong, P. Coti-Bertrand, Postoperative albumin drop is a marker for surgical stress and a predictor for clinical outcome: A pilot study, Gastroenterol Res Pract, (2016):8743187.
- E. Lin, S.E. Calvano, S.F. Lowry, Inflammatory cytokines and cell response in surgery, Surgery, 127(2000):117-126.
- A.G. Hill, G.L. Hill, Metabolic response to severe injury, Br J Surg, 85(1998):884-890.
- S. Glund, A. Krook, Role of interleukin-6 signalling in glucose and lipid metabolism, Acta Physiol (Oxf), 192(2008):37-48.
- G. Van Hall, A. Steensberg, M. Sacchetti, C. Fischer, C. Keller, et al. Interleukin-6 stimulates lipolysis and fat oxidation in humans, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 88(2003):3005-3010.
- P.E. Marik, M. Flemmer, The immune response to surgery and trauma: Implications for treatment, J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 73(2012):801-808.
- R. Easton, Z.J. Balogh, Peri-operative changes in serum immune markers after trauma: A systematic review, Injury, 45(2014):934-941.
- C. Lelubre, S. Anselin, K. Zouaoui Boudjeltia, P. Biston, M. Piagnerelli, Interpretation of C-reactive protein concentrations in critically ill patients, Biomed Res Int, (2013):124021.
- K. Mahkovic-Hergouth, L. Kompan, Is replacement of albumin in major abdominal surgery useful? J Clin Anesth, 23(2011):42-46.
- P. Rittler, R. Jacobs, H. Demmelmair, D. Kuppinger, S. Braun, Dynamics of albumin synthesis after major rectal operation, Surgery, 141(2007):660-666.
Copyright: © Mirton, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.