Research Article - Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research ( 2024) Volume 13, Issue 9
Micromeritics and In-Vivo Bioavailability study for PEG400 and labrasol Based Liquisolid Compacts of Tacrolimus
M. Somesu1, Chinam Niranjan Patra2*, Goutam Kumar Jena2, Saroj Kumar Raul2, Anjan Kumar2 and P. Bharghava Bhusan Rao32Department of Pharmacy, Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India
3Department of Pharmacy, AM Reddy Memorial College of Pharmacy, India
Chinam Niranjan Patra, Department of Pharmacy, Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India, Email: drniranjanrips@gmail.com
Received: 02-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. JDAR-24-147723; Editor assigned: 04-Sep-2024, Pre QC No. JDAR-24-147723 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Sep-2024, QC No. JDAR-24-147723; Revised: 23-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. JDAR-24-147723 (R); Published: 30-Oct-2024, DOI: 10.4303/JDAR/236410
Abstract
The objective of this study is to enhance flowability, compressibility and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus using the liquisolid technique. Tacrolimus primarily functions as an immunosuppressant. The primary obstacles for developing effective formulations for this compound are its limited aqueous solubility and low bioavailability, reported to be 25%. To address this, we formulated cinacalcet HCl liquisolid compacts with PEG 400 and labrasol as the non-volatile solvents, sylysia 350 as the carrier material, and aerosil as the coating material. Our comprehensive analysis included Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Powder
X-ray Diffraction (P-XRD), kawakita analysis, quality control tests and pharmacokinetic study. The results indicated improved flowability, compressibity, no drug-excipient interaction and tacrolimus presence in the porous carrier in a dissolved state. Notably, selected formulation (L6) exhibited enhanced dissolution rate, disintegrating in less than 3 min with significant improvement in oral bioavailability. Overall, the liquisolid approach holds promise for developing a stable and scalable solid dosage form with improved flowability, compressibility and oral bioavailability.
Keywords
Kawakita analysis; Sylysia 350; Dissolution rate; Pharmacokinetic study
Introduction
Poorly water-soluble drugs exhibit slow dissolution rates, which pose a significant challenge in formulating oral pharmaceutical dosage forms [1]. Enhancing solubility and dissolution rate is crucial for improving drug absorption along the intestinal tract [2]. Various approaches have been explored to address this issue, including solid dispersions inclusion complexation, particle size reduction, salt formation, co-crystallization, co-solvency, spray-drying techniques, lyophilisation, micronization and microwave for improving rate of dissolution [3-12].
The liquisolid approach, devised by Spireas and their team, offers a strategy to increase the dissolution rate of poorly water-soluble pharmaceuticals [13]. The technique involves incorporating poorly water-soluble pharmaceuticals into a non-volatile solvent that is miscible with water, either in dissolved or suspended form. This mixture can then be transformed into a flowable, compressible, non-adherent powder [14]. The process involves using a porous carrier and a coating material. A dry powder is produced by covering the wet porous coating material with fine particles [15].
Tacrolimus primarily functions as an immunosuppressant [16]. Classified as a BCS Class II drug, it exhibits low water miscibility but readily permeates biological membranes, characterized by high log P values [17]. The primary obstacles for developing effective formulations for this compound are its limited aqueous solubility and low bioavailability, reported to be 25% [18]. This study aims to enhance flowability, compressibility, dissolution properties, and oral absorption tacrolimus using the liquisolid approach.
Materials
A gift sample of Tacrolimus was obtained from DRL, Hyderabad, India. A gift sample of Sylysia 350 was obtained from Fuji Sylysia, Japan. Labrasol came as complimentary sample from Gattefosse India Ltd. PEG600 and aerosol was sourced from Himedia, India.
Methods
Pre-formulation study
Solubility study: Following the standard protocol, the saturation solubility of tacrolimus was examined in a range of non-volatile liquid vehicles, as shown in Figure 1 [14]. These non-volatile liquids were saturated with tacrolimus, which were then stirred for 48 h at room temperature. The solutions were then filtered, centrifuged, and processed to UV Visible spectrophotometric examination 287 nm.
Figure 1: Saturation solubility of tacrolimus in non-volatile solvents
Determination of loading factor: To determine the maximum liquid load capacity sylysia 350 and aerosol were selected as porous carrier and coating material respectively at an R value of 20. To these admixtures of porous carrier and coating material (10 g), increasing amounts of nonvolatile liquids PEG400 and labrasol were added. After mixing for 3 minutes, the mixture was kept overnight and the angle of repose was determined. The admixture showing angle of repose 25° was selected [19].
Preparation of liquisolid powder: Two non-volatile solvents, namely PEG400 and labrasol were chosen for preparing liquisolid compacts due to their higher solubilisation capacity to dissolve tacrolimus. The drug was dissolved separately in these selected solvents in different drug loading percentages (2.5% to 15%) and vortexed for 10 minutes (Table 1). Subsequently, the necessary quantity of sylysia 350 and aerosol (20:1 ratio) was incorporated as carrier and coating agents.
Table 1: Composition of liquisolid powder of tacrolimus
Formulation code | Non-volatile Solvent (mL) | Tacrolimus (% W/V) | Carrier coating ratio (R) | Lf | Tacrolimus (mg) | Practical weight of liquid medication (W) | Quantity of carrier Q in g (Q=W/Lf) | Quantity of coating (q) in g q=Q/R | Total weight (g) | Amount Equivalent to 5 mg of Tacrolimus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 | PEG 400 (5 mL) | 2.5 | 20 | 3.425 | 125 | 5.462 | 1.592 | 0.079 | 7.133 | 285.32 |
L2 | 5 | 250 | 5.587 | 1.631 | 0.081 | 7.299 | 145.98 | |||
L3 | 7.5 | 375 | 5.712 | 1.668 | 0.083 | 7.463 | 99.51 | |||
L4 | 10 | 500 | 5.837 | 1.704 | 0.085 | 7.626 | 76.26 | |||
L5 | 12.5 | 625 | 5.962 | 1.74 | 0.087 | 7.789 | 62.31 | |||
L6 | 15 | 750 | 6.087 | 1.772 | 0.088 | 7.947 | 52.98 | |||
L7 | Labrasol (5 mL) | 2.5 | 2.937 | 125 | 5.22 | 1.777 | 0.088 | 7.085 | 283.4 | |
L8 | 5 | 250 | 5.345 | 1.819 | 0.09 | 7.254 | 145.08 | |||
L9 | 7.5 | 375 | 5.47 | 1.862 | 0.093 | 7.425 | 99 | |||
L10 | 10 | 500 | 5.595 | 1.905 | 0.095 | 7.595 | 75.95 | |||
L11 | 12.5 | 625 | 5.72 | 1.947 | 0.099 | 7.766 | 62.12 | |||
L12 | 15 | 750 | 5.845 | 1.99 | 0.099 | 7.835 | 52.23 |
Characterization
Flowability: The micromeritic properties of all formulations (L1 to L12) were comprehensively evaluated using established methodologies. These included the determination of Carr’s index, angle of repose, and Hausner’s ratio to assess powder flowability characteristics [20].
Kawakita analysis: A 100 ml glass measuring cylinder was taken and filled with 10 g of tacrolimus and 10 g of tacrolimus loaded liquisolid formulation Initial bulk volume was designated as V0 and tapped volume after N number of tappings designated as V [21].
Compatibility is represented by “a,” while cohesiveness is expressed as the reciprocal of “b.” The degree of volume reduction, denoted by “C,” is calculated using the original volume (V0) and tapped volume (V) according to the following equation:
Graphical representation of N/C against the number of taps (N) yielded a linear relationship, from which the numerical values of constants a and 1/b were determined. (N=0, 50, 100, 150, and 200).
Preparation of liquisolid tablets
Liquisolid formulations L5, L6, L10, L11 and L12 were selected for tableting as these powders exhibited desirable flowability and compressibility. Sodium starch glycolate and talc were subsequently introduced and mixed for 5 minutes (Table 2). This liquisolid powder was then directly compressed into tablet of 6 mm diameter using a Minipress- II, Karnavati, Ahmedabad.
Quality control tests
Quality control assessments were conducted on the liquisolid tablets (L5, L6, L10, L11, and L12) according to standard procedure [22].
Table 2: Composition of liquisolid tablets (batch size 50 tablets per formulation)
Formulation code | Liquisolid powder equivalent to 5 mg of tacrolimus | Sodium starch glycolate (mg) | Lactose (mg) | Total weight/Tablet (mg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
L5 | 63 | 3 | 34 | 100 |
L6 | 53 | 3 | 44 | 100 |
L10 | 76 | 3 | 21 | 100 |
L11 | 62 | 3 | 35 | 100 |
L12 | 53 | 3 | 44 | 100 |
In vitro dissolution test
Liquisolid tablets (L5, L6, L10, L11 and L12) and pure drug tacrolimus underwent dissolution testing. The study employed USP type II paddle equipment operating at 50 rpm, using 0.1 N HCl as the dissolution medium for a span of 2 h. The dissolution profiles were analyzed to determine key parameters such as Q30, Q45, average dissolution time, and the correlation to the Hixson-Crowell cube root model [23].
DSC study
Accurately weighed samples of tacrolimus, powdered samples of liquisolid tablets (L6, and L12) were enclosed in sealed aluminum pans and subjected to thermal analysis with heating rate 100°C/min upto a temperature of 220°C.
P-XRD study
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained for both tacrolimus and powdered samples of liquisolid tablets (L6 and L12) within the 2° to 70° 2θ angular range.
Stability study
The stability characteristics of formulation L6 were assessed under accelerated conditions (40°C ± 2°C/75% ± 5% relative humidity) over a 6-month period. The study protocol adhered to the ICH Q1A (R2) guidelines. Liquisolid tablet integrity was evaluated by measuring drug content, disintegration time, and dissolution at 30 min mark [24].
Pharmacokinetic study
Twelve male albino rabbits with a body weight of 2 kg were carefully selected for this study. Group 1 (6 rabbits) received the tacrolimus liquisolid tablet (L6) as the test substance, while Group 2 (6 rabbits) was administered the standard aqueous suspension of tacrolimus. The dose for rabbit was calculated as 0.46 mg (=0.5 mg). An amount equivalent to 0.5 mg dose was given orally using a Ryle’s tube. Blood samples (0.5 mL) were drawn from the marginal ear vein of male rabbits at specific time points (0 hours, 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours) with a 24-gauge needle and collected in eppendorf tubes. Pharmacokinetic parameters including Cmax, Tmax, and AUC were calculated. The study was conducted with IAEC (160) approval. UFLC was performed using a reported method on a 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d 0.5 μm particle, C18 column with 85:15 (V/V) acetonitrile: Phosphate buffer pH 4.0 (1 mM) as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 ml/min using PDA detection at 198 nm [25].
Results and Discussion
Solubility study
Tacrolimus was most soluble in PEG 400, reaching a concentration of 247 mg/mL, whereas labrasol achieved a solubility of 198 mg/mL (Figure 1). PEG400 and labrasol were selected for further studies. Both PEG400 and labrasol enhances solubility by forming micelles or emulsions. These non-volatile solvents can encapsulate lipophilic drugs within its micellar structures, effectively increasing their solubility in aqueous media [26].
Liquid loading factor
The flowable liquid retention potential values for admixture of sylysia 350 and aerosol (R=20) were 3.425 and 2.937 for PEG 400 and labrasol, respectively. The adsorption capacity of Sylysia 350 is approximately 310 mL per 100 grams. It has a high specific surface area of 300 m²/g, making it effective for adsorbing a significant proportion of drugs or other substances [27].
Preparation of liquisolid compact
Liquisolid powders were formulated using a mixing technique. The chosen method is scalable and adaptable. Tacrolimus exhibited complete solubility in both PEG400 and Labrasol. An increase in drug loading (2.5% to 15%) as well as sylysia 350 content within the liquisolid formulation resulted in improved flowability, thereby enhancing its suitability for tablet compression.
Flowability
Flowability assessments indicated that pure tacrolimus exhibited suboptimal flow properties. Conversely, liquisolid formulations (L5, L6, L10, L11 and L12) demonstrated favorable tableting characteristics because of higher proportion of sylysia 350 and higher drug loading irrespective of variations in non-volatile solvent (Table 3). The improved flowability of the liquisolid formulations is likely due to the adsorptive and compressible properties inherent to sylysia 350 [28]. Additionally, the presence of an aerosol coating on the wet surface of the porous carrier contributes to the improved flowability [29].
Table 3: Micromeritic properties of tacrolimus and its liquisolid powder formulations
Formulation | Angle of repose(°) | Carr’s index (%) | Hausner’s ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Tacrolimus | 43 ± 3.1 | 38.6 ± 2.43 | 1.62 ± 0.06 |
L1 | 41.35 ± 1.56 | 38.25 ± 2.15 | 1.49 ± 0.01 |
L2 | 40.35 ± 1.48 | 35.25 ± 1.16 | 1.45 ± 0.05 |
L3 | 38.35 ± 2.14 | 36.05 ± 1.57 | 1.43 ± 0.02 |
L4 | 41.35 ± 2.14 | 43.05 ± 1.57 | 1.67 ± 0.02 |
L5 | 24.19 ±0.55 | 28.28 ± 1.84 | 1.35 ± 0.01 |
L6 | 23.78 ± 1.59 | 28.28 ± 1.84 | 1.35 ± 0.01 |
L7 | 42.16 ± 1.05 | 41.64 ± 1.02 | 1.69 ± 0.04 |
L8 | 43.75 ± 1.98 | 40.75 ± 1.03 | 1.48 ± 0.05 |
L9 | 41.35 ± 2.54 | 40.12 ± 1.01 | 1.41 ± 0.03 |
L10 | 21.12 ± 2.14 | 20.12 ± 2.01 | 1.21 ± 0.03 |
L11 | 20.12 ± 2.18 | 21.13 ± 1.01 | 1.12 ± 0.03 |
L12 | 20.36 ± 1.05 | 23.35 ± 2.01 | 1.17 ± 0.01 |
*Mean ± SD, n=6 |
Kawakita analysis
Liquisolid formulations with higher drug loading demonstrated superior flowability compared to Tacrolimus, as indicated by lower ‘a’ values, a measure of compactability. Additionally, these formulations exhibited reduced cohesiveness, as evidenced by lower ‘1/b’ values, when compared to Tacrolimus (Table 4).
Table 4: Kawakita analysis of liquisolid Formulation
Formulation | Compactibility (a) | Cohesiveness (1/b) | Coefficient of determination (r2) |
---|---|---|---|
Tacrolimus | 0.72 | 37.74 | 0.983 |
L1 | 0.46 | 27.12 | 0.961 |
L2 | 0.48 | 28.31 | 0.973 |
L3 | 0.36 | 27.25 | 0.988 |
L4 | 0.25 | 21.25 | 0.964 |
L5 | 0.17 | 18.14 | 0.987 |
L6 | 0.14 | 17.23 | 0.997 |
L7 | 0.57 | 25.85 | 0.997 |
L8 | 0.46 | 24.34 | 0.995 |
L9 | 0.32 | 22.55 | 0.996 |
L10 | 0.21 | 17.16 | 0.998 |
L11 | 0.16 | 18.09 | 0.992 |
L12 | 0.13 | 17.15 | 0.993 |
Quality control tests for liquisolid tablets
All liquisolid tablets demonstrated drug content surpassing 96% confirming homogeneous mixing of the drug within the excipients matrix. All formulations exhibited weight variations that complied with the ± 10% acceptance criterion, indicative of satisfactory flow properties. All the selected tablets disintegrated within 4 min suggesting appropriate proportion of disintegrating agent i.e. sodium starch glycolate. Hardness of all the tablet formulations were nearer to 5 kg/cm2 which is within the acceptable range (Table 5).
Table 5: Quality control tests for liquisolid tablets
Formulations | Drug content* (%) | Weight variation** (mg) | Friability** (%) | Hardness*** (Kg/cm2) | Disintegration time*** (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L5 | 97 ± 3.8 | 100 ± 7 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 5.2 ± 0.12 | 4 ± 1.6 |
L6 | 99 ± 1.1 | 100 ± 8 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 5.1 ± 0.15 | 2.5 ± 1.3 |
L10 | 96 ± 1.5 | 100 ± 3 | 0.1 ± 0.05 | 5.3 ± 0.13 | 3.5 ± 1.2 |
L11 | 97 ± 3.2 | 100 ± 5 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | 5.6 ± 0.17 | 2.4 ± 1.05 |
L12 | 98 ± 1.9 | 100 ± 6 | 0.5 ± 0.05 | 5.1 ± 0.13 | 2.3 ± 1.5 |
*Mean ± SD, n=10, **Mean ± SD, n=20, ***Mean ± SD, n=6 |
In vitro dissolution test
Interestingly, around 20% of tacrolimus dissolved during 2 h of dissolution study (Figure 2). However, liquisolid tablets with PEG400 as non-volatile solvent (L6) exhibited nearly 100% dissolution of tacrolimus in 45 min whereas L5 took 60 min for 100% dissolution. Liquisolid tablets with labrasol as non-volatile solvent (L10, L11 and L12) demonstrated 100% dissolution in 2 h. The higher rate of dissolution for L6 can be ascribed to higher solubility of tacrolimus in PEG400 and higher percentage of drug loading. Significantly, formulations L6 exhibited dissolution rates that were 9 times higher compared to that of tacrolimus when assessed using the Q30 and Q45 parameter (Table 6). Liquisolid tablet L6 exhibited the shortest Mean Dissolution Time (MDT) among all formulations tested, indicating enhanced dissolution efficacy relative to pure tacrolimus [30].
Table 6: In-vitro release kinetic study
Parameters | Tacrolimus | L5 | L6 | L10 | L11 | L12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q30 (%) | 8.1 ± 0.03 | 68 ± 0.5 | 77 ± 1.2 | 26 ± | 27 ± 1.2 | 32 ± 1.1 |
Q45 (%) | 11.4 ± 0.04 | 85 ± 3.5 | 100 ± 2.5 | 44 ± 5.5 | 48 ± 2.5 | 51 ± 1.6 |
MDT (min) | 45 ± 02 | 24 ± 0.6 | 23 ± 0.8 | 31 ± 1.1 | 31.2 ± 1.3 | 30.5 ± 0.8 |
Hixson Crowell’s (r2) | 0.879 | 0.987 | 0.998 | 0.976 | 0.991 | 0.994 |
Mean ± SD, n=6 |
Figure 2: In-vitro dissolution profile for liquisolid tablets
DSC study
An evident endothermic peak resulting from drug melting is visible in the thermogram of pure Tacrolimus (123°C). The presence of a strong endothermic peak and a narrow melting range confirms the crystalline form of Tacrolimus (Figure 3). The DSC for both PEG400 and labrasol based liquisolid formulation did not manifest any melting peak which can be ascribed to the presence of Tacrolimus is liquid form i.e. dissolved or molecular state.
Figure 3: DSC thermogram for tacrolimus, L6 and L12
P-XRD study
P-XRD diffractogram for tacrolimus suggests that it is a crystalline drug as it has shown peaks at 2ê? angles of 10°, 11°, 14.1°, 17°, 18.96°, 19.924° (Figure 4). The diffractograms for powdered samples of both liquisolid tablets (L5 and L12) completely disappeared i.e. no peaks were observed at any of the 2° angles. This complete absence of peaks for PEG400 and labrasol based liquisolid formulations can be imputed to the presence of tacrolimus in solubilised (molecular) form.
Figure 4: P-XRD for tacrolimus, L6 and L12
Stability study
Liquisolid tablets (L6) did not exhibit any significant change in quality control parameters during 6 months of stability study (ICH) guidelines (Table 7).
Table 7: Stability data liquisolid tablet (L6)
Time (months) | Drug content (% w/w) | Disintegration time (min) | Drug release at 30 min (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 99 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 1.3 | 77 ± 1.2 |
1 | 99.1 ±1.7 | 2.4 ± .03 | 76 ± 0.5 |
2 | 98.1 ± 4.85 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 78 ± 0.5 |
3 | 98.6 ± 4.82 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 74 ± 0.5 |
6 | 98.2 ± 3.56 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 75 ± 0.5 |
Mean ± SD, n=6 |
Pharmacokinetic study
The pharmacokinetic study findings for aqueous suspension of tacrolimus and liquisolid tablet (L6) suggest that PEG400 based liquisolid tablet (L6) exhibited faster dissolution and rapid absorption as ascertained from the decrease of Tmax from 6 h to 2 h (Figure 5) (Table 8). The intensity of action for liquisolid tablet (L6) was nearly 4.5 time more as evidenced from Cmax values. The AUC (area under the curve) values are higher for liquisolid tablet which suggests that oral bioavailabilty was increased by 4.4 fold [31].
Table 8: Pharmacokinetic parameters
PK parameters | Aqueous suspension of tacrolimus | Liquisolid tablet (L6) |
---|---|---|
Cmax (µg/ml) | 67.2 ± 6.5 | 301.8 ± 4.2 |
Tmax (h) | 6 ± 0.3 | 2 ± 0.2 |
AUC (µg.h/ml) | 775.29 ± 32.17 | 3461.92 ± 56.81 |
Mean ± SD, n=6 |
Figure 5: Serum drug concentration versus Time curve for aqueous suspension of tacrolimus and L6
Conclusion
Non-volatile solvents PEG400 and Labrasol were successfully employed in the creation of liquisolid formulations Notably, the PEG400-based liquisolid formulation demonstrated significant improvements in solubility and dissolution rate. he porous support material, Sylysia 350, coated with Aerosil (R=20), demonstrated exceptional liquid adsorption properties. These liquisolid formulations also displayed desirable flowability for tablet processing. These liquisolid formulations exhibited excellent flow properties, making them suitable for direct compression into tablets. Among them, formulation L6 exhibited higher dissolution, disintegration in 2.5 min. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic study revealed a 4.4 fold enhancement in oral bioavailability for liquisolid formulation L6. Thus, the successful application of the liquisolid technique can enhance both dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus.
Acknowledgement
The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge Dr. Sukant Tripathy, Professor, Berhampur University for P-XRD study.
Funding
The infrastructure for this research was funded by Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Berhampur.
Conflict Of Interest
We declare that, we all authors have no conflict of interest.
References
- A. Hermans, J. Milsmann, H. Li, C. Jede, A. Moir, et al. Challenges and strategies for solubility measurements and dissolution method development for amorphous solid dispersion formulations, AAPS J, 25(2022):11.
- K.T. Savjani, A.K. Gajjar, J.K. Savjani, Drug solubility: Importance and enhancement techniques, ISRN Pharm, 2012.
- J. Sruti, C.N. Patra, S. Swain, K.C. Panigrahi, A.P. Patro, et al. Improvement in the dissolution rate and tableting properties of cefuroxime axetil by melt-granulated dispersion and surface adsorption, Acta pharmaceutica sinica B, 3(2013):113-122.
- M. Paczkowska, M. Mizera, D. Szymanowska-Powalowska, K. Lewandowska, W. Blaszczak, β-Cyclodextrin complexation as an effective drug delivery system for meropenem, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 99(2016):24-34.
- V. Martena, R. Shegokar, P. Di Martino, R.H. Muller, Effect of four different size reduction methods on the particle size, solubility enhancement and physical stability of nicergoline nanocrystals, Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 40(2014):1199-1205.
- A.T.M. Serajuddin, Salt formation to improve drug solubility, Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 59(2007):603-616.
- F.M. Khan, M. Ahmad, F. Batool, Enhancement of solubility and release profile of simvastatin by co-crystallization with citric acid, Trop J Pharma Res, 18(2019):2465-2472.
- A.K. Nayak, P.P. Panigrahi, Solubility enhancement of etoricoxib by cosolvency approach, ISRN Pharm, 2012(2012):820653.
- B. Wang, J. Xiang, B. He, S. Tan, W. Zhou, Enhancing bioavailability of natural extracts for nutritional applications through Dry Powder Inhalers (DPI) spray drying: Technological advancements and future directions, Front Nutr, 10(2023):1190912.
- A. Taldaev, D.I. Pankov, R.P. Terekhov, A.K. Zhevlakova, I.A. Selivanova, Modification of the physicochemical properties of active pharmaceutical ingredients via lyophilization, Pharmaceutics, 15(2023):2607.
- N. Rasenack, B.W. MÃÂ?¼ller, Dissolution rate enhancement by in situ micronization of poorly water-soluble drugs, Pharm Res, 19(2002):1894-1900.
- N.Q. Shi, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, B. Feng, Z.Q. Li, et al. Study on the properties of felodipine solid dispersions prepared by different technologies, J Peking Univer Health Sci, 48(2016):1067-1073.
- S. Spireas, Liquisolid systems and methods of preparing same, Google Patents, 2002.
- M. Lu, H. Xing, J. Jiang, X. Chen, T. Yang, et al. Liquisolid technique and its applications in pharmaceutics, Asian J Pharm Sci, 12(2017):115-123.
- P.S. Kanojiya, P.N. Ghodake, R.N. Wadetwar, Design and optimization of liquisolid compact based vaginal sustained release tablet of antifungal agent for vaginal candidiasis, J Dispersion Sci Tech, 45(2024):513-528.
- T. Ruzicka, T. Assmann, B. Homey, Tacrolimus: The drug for the turn of the millennium? Arch Dermatol, 135(1999):574-580.
- J.H. Kang, J. Chon, Y.I. Kim, H.J. Lee, D.W. Oh, et al. Preparation and evaluation of tacrolimus-loaded thermosensitive solid lipid nanoparticles for improved dermal distribution, Int J Nanomedicine, 2019:5381-5396.
- H. Arima, K. Yunomae, K. Miyake, T. Irie, F. Hirayama, et al. Comparative studies of the enhancing effects of cyclodextrins on the solubility and oral bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats, J Pharm Sci, 90(2001):690-701.
- I. Aleksic, T. GliÃÂ?¡ic, S. Cvijic, J. Parojcic, Liquisolid systems: Evaluation of the influence of formulation variables on the optimum liquid load, Arch Pharm, 72(2022):61-76.
- P.J. Sinko, Martin's physical pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences, 2023.
- C.N. Patra, S. Swain, S. Mahanty, K.C. Panigrahi, Design and characterization of aceclofenac and paracetamol spherical crystals and their tableting properties, Powder Technology, 274(2015):446-454.
- L. Lachman, H.A. Lieberman, J.L. Kanig, The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy, Lea Febiger Philadelphia, (1976).
- M.L. Bruschi, Strategies to modify the drug release from pharmaceutical systems, Woodhead Publish, (2015).
- R.M. Haleem, M.Y. Salem, F.A. Fatahallah, L.E. Abdelfattah, Quality in the pharmaceutical industry-a literature review, Saudi Pharm J, 23(2015):463-469.
- V. Gote, A. Mandal, M. Alshamrani, D. Pal, Self-assembling tacrolimus nanomicelles for retinal drug delivery, Pharmaceutics, 12(2020):1072.
- A. Nakaweh, F. Al-Akayleh, M. Al-Remawi, Q. Abdallah, A.S.A. Agha, Deep eutectic system-based liquisolid nanoparticles as drug delivery system of curcumin for in-vitro colon cancer cells, J Pharm Innovat, 19(2024):1-11.
- C.N. Patra, R. Singha, K. Sahu, G.K. Jena, N.R. Das, et al. Current updated review on applications of different grades of sylysia in pharmaceutical formulation development, Biomed Mater Dev, 2024:1-18.
- K. Kamble Sharad, S. Shinde Sunita, A review: Various adsorbent carriers used for enhancing dissolution profile.
- P. Kominova, L. Kulaviak, P. Zamostny, Stress-dependent particle interactions of magnesium aluminometasilicates as their performance factor in powder flow and compaction applications, Materials, 14(2021):900.
- K.S. Rao, M. Nagabhushanam, K. Chowdary, In vitro dissolution studies on solid dispersions of mefenamic acid, Indian J Pharm Sci, 73(2011):243.
- C.N. Patra, A. Mishra, G.K. Jena, K.C. Panigrahi, J. Sruti, et al. QbD enabled formulation development of nanoemulsion of nimodipine for improved biopharmaceutical performance, J Pharm Innov, 2023:1-19.
Copyright: © M. Somesu, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.